If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower of exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
https://squareblogs.net/grousetwine12/what-is-the-minimum-acceptable-length-between-yourself-along-with-a-5g-mobile
Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those living further distance from them.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.