What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While  what is a safe distance from a cell tower , they still can create issues for users.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further you are from it.

While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research.  safe distance to live from cell phone tower  includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.