If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
https://alexandersen-mcdaniel.technetbloggers.de/how-long-away-can-one-be-from-a-new-5g-mobile-tower-before-becoming-hazardous of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. safe distance to live from cell phone tower can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower.
While it sounds like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.