If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can result in many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used mobile phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.
While it sounds like a good idea however, those living close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were far from antennas.
This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. safe distance to live from cell phone tower can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.