Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices.  safe distance from cell tower  are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in many possible harms, like the development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.

While it sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those living further far from antennas.

But, the study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.



This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

In  what is a safe distance from a cell tower , the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is  https://alexandersen-mcdaniel.technetbloggers.de/are-usually-safest-distance-from-the-5g-cell-tower-1682463652  for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.