Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.



These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away you are from it.

While  Website link  sounds like something that's good, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

what is a safe distance from a cell tower  does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects.  safe distance from cell tower  would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.